back to top
Saturday, December 21, 2024
spot_img
HomeClimateWas Vincent van Gogh a visionary environmentalist ahead of his era?

Was Vincent van Gogh a visionary environmentalist ahead of his era?

What connects an iconic 19th-century painter with a contemporary photographer? A shared inspiration: nature’s beauty – and its vulnerability to human activity.

Two new books feature artists whose work, done centuries apart, helps demonstrate the profound impacts of humans on the environment.

In “Van Gogh and the End of Nature,” author Michael Lobel traces evidence of environmental destruction across the acclaimed painter’s body of work. In “Entropy,” photographer Diane Tuft captures images of environmental impacts; two guest essays articulate the cultural history and science behind the art.

Vincent van Gogh: Celebrating nature’s beauty, or bearing witness to its demise?

Cover image of a book titled "Van Gogh and the End of Nature," with a painting of smokestacks

Climate-concerned readers up on the news may recall recent examples of how climate change affected Van Gogh’s art: the infamous soup-slinging incidents of 2022 and 2024, when Just Stop Oil protesters threw tomato soup at “Sunflowers” (1888*), the beloved painting on display in London’s National Gallery.

The New York Times reported that the protesters chose the painting solely for its high profile: “It was simply ‘an iconic painting, by an iconic painter’ and an attack on it would generate headlines.”

For Michael Lobel, professor of art history at Hunter College and at the Graduate Center of City University of New York, however, there are intrinsic connections between Van Gogh and climate change.

Though he has often been dubbed “the quintessential painter of nature,” a deeper look at the full range of Van Gogh’s work reveals a more complex relationship with nature. Beyond simply recording its beauty, Lobel argues, Van Gogh’s work reflects direct experience with its demise in the form of industrialization across the European landscape. Acknowledging Bill McKibben’s 1989 book, “The End of Nature,” Lobel proposes that Van Gogh also understood that human impacts on the environment could be devastating, even when rendered beautifully.

Van Gogh and the End of Nature” is an engaging blend of biography, criticism, and environmental history. Hearkening back to the physics of the ancient world, Lobel names his first four chapters after the elements – air, earth, fire, and water – thought to make up, in different combinations, all that one could see. In the final chapter, “Colors,” Lobel recounts how the new chemistry of fossil fuels created the brighter pigments Van Gogh used to depict his nature.

A landscape painting shows the sun setting over a wheat field. Smokestacks are visible on the left side of the paintingA landscape painting shows the sun setting over a wheat field. Smokestacks are visible on the left side of the painting
Cropped image of Van Gogh’s “Summer Evening” (1888). (Image credit: WikiArt / public domain)

In the book’s first chapter, “Air,” Lobel shows how smokestacks pervade Van Gogh’s work. In the backgrounds of many paintings, plumes of black smoke stream from factories, gas works, homes, and locomotives. Depending on weather conditions, the dust, soot, and fumes he painted could become life-threatening. And Lobel suggests that Van Gogh experienced this directly; he was briefly stationed in London during one of its toxic fogs.

The coal burned to power machines and heat buildings had to be mined, resulting in the gashes that crisscrossed and the slag heaps that dotted Van Gogh’s landscapes. In “Earth,” Lobel surveys the artist’s many drawings and paintings of these scars.

Lobel then turns, in “Fire,” to Van Gogh’s night scenes, among his most popular paintings. In his notebooks and letters, Van Gogh wrote passionately about painting at night. These passages inspired a memorable scene in “Lust for Life,” the 1956 film in which Kirk Douglas, playing Van Gogh, wears a straw hat festooned with candles while dabbing furiously at a dimly lit canvas. Lobel notes that Van Gogh relied, instead, on the light provided by gas-burning streetlights.

A favorite night painting, “Starry Night Over Rhone,” gives Lobel entry to his fourth chapter, “Water.” The scene depicted is just below the point where the Roubine du Roi joins the Rhone. The Roubine du Roi, Lobel points out, often reeked from the raw sewage that flowed from houses into street drains and then into waterways. Fumes from volatile chemicals dumped into the river by factories lining its shores sometimes masked the organic odors while posing dangers of their own.

A painting of a river landscape at night. Stars are visible, and lights reflect in the riverA painting of a river landscape at night. Stars are visible, and lights reflect in the river
Van Gogh’s “Starry Night Over the Rhone” (1888) (Image credit: WikiArt / public domain)

But dangerous chemicals and metals, Lobel shows in his final chapter on “Colors,” were integral to Van Gogh’s art. Several of his signature paints – like Paris green, garancine red, and methyl violet – contained toxic metals like arsenic, required toxic chemicals to refine, or were derived from toxic byproducts of industrialization, like coal tar.

These chemically derived colors influenced paintings of that era in other ways. The brilliantly colored clothing that appears in many works from this period could only be made with chemically enhanced dyes. Then when dumped by the factories that made them or the mills that used them, these dyes may have colored the streams the artists painted – or so one contemporaneous critic, skeptical of the brilliant blues in Edouard Manet’s “Argenteuil,” speculated.

Despite the fact that Manet and other artists of the era also addressed the impacts of industrialization, Lobel argues that Van Gogh is a special case. “His art was deeply engaged with, if not dependent on, modern industry and, more pointedly, industrial pollution, on which he regularly drew for the subjects, concerns, and even the very materials of his work.”

The Just Stop Oil protesters were not wrong to single him out.

Diane Tuft: Chronicling environmental change with photography

Cover of a book titled "Entropy," showing a degraded pink and blue watery landscape Cover of a book titled "Entropy," showing a degraded pink and blue watery landscape

Fast forward to an artist from a very different era: Photographer Diane Tuft, who has witnessed the increasing effects of climate change in her own lifetime.

A specialist in aerial photography, Diane Tuft’s previous work includes “The Arctic Melt” (2017), in which she relied on the spectrum visible to the naked eye, and “Gondwana” (2012) and “Unseen” (2009) in which, with special films, she captured images at frequencies beyond human perception.

In the introduction to her new book, “Entropy,” Tuft draws a line back to her photographs of ice.

The word entropy aptly characterizes climate change’s effect on … water. As ice melts, molecules gain energy, spread further apart, and lose their crystalline structure. … As water further transforms into a gaseous state, this disarray intensifies. Water is its own thermodynamic system. … We are seeing the unpredictability of its effects … unfold in real time.

The 80 photographs included in “Entropy,” most taken as the artist flew over her chosen landscapes in helicopters, record how climate change has altered Earth’s surface through

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments