.cpi-spinner-loader {
width: 60px;
aspect-ratio: 2;
–_g: no-repeat radial-gradient(circle closest-side, #000 90%, #0000);
background:
var(–_g) 0% 50%,
var(–_g) 50% 50%,
var(–_g) 100% 50%;
background-size: calc(100%/3) 50%;
animation: l3 1s infinite linear;
}
@keyframes l3 {
20% {
background-position: 0% 0%, 50% 50%, 100% 50%
}
40% {
background-position: 0% 100%, 50% 0%, 100% 50%
}
60% {
background-position: 0% 50%, 50% 100%, 100% 0%
}
80% {
background-position: 0% 50%, 50% 50%, 100% 100%
}
}
The concerns to protect EU’s technology has intensified to a state where the European Commission has acknowledged its relevance. Some Foreign Direct Investment rules to restrict the acquisition of EU critical assets have come into effect. In addition, Member States have been encouraged to adopt measures to protect their 5G networks. This article argues that these strategic frameworks are inherently limited, and that this limitation has been reinforced by the disparity in interests and approach
…
THIS ARTICLE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR IP ADDRESS 37.44.245.186
Please verify email or join us
to access premium content!
