back to top
Thursday, February 20, 2025
HomeSportsHoward Webb defends referee Michael Oliver's decision on Myles Lewis-Skelly's red card...

Howard Webb defends referee Michael Oliver’s decision on Myles Lewis-Skelly’s red card at Wolves, believes Arsenal defender’s sending off was wrong.

Howard Webb says Myles Lewis-Skelly’s red card against Wolves was the wrong decision – but defended referee Michael Oliver and his officials by saying the call was not a “horrendous” one.

Lewis-Skelly was controversially sent off by Oliver in the first half of Arsenal’s 1-0 win over Wolves for fouling Matt Doherty, a decision which was later overturned after an appeal by Arsenal, who were handed a £65,000 fine for their on-field reaction to the red card.

In the latest episode of Match Official’s Mic’d Up, where the referee’s audio was released, VAR Darren England showed no desire to send Oliver to the VAR monitor, with no input from the assistant referees in the decision-making.

PGMOL chief Webb believes England should have intervened to notice the “glanced studs” from Lewis-Skelly that should have kept him on the pitch – despite the assistant VAR referencing it in the audio.

The VAR audio in full

Referee: “I’m going to go red card, mate. Red card on the ankle. Red card, serious foul play.”

VAR: “Just checking the red card for serious foul play. OK, it’s for serious foul play, not DOGSO (Denying an Obvious Goalscoring Opportunity).

“OK, for me the contact’s on the top of the foot.”

Assistant VAR: “I think he catches him on the side of the ankle first. It glances off the side of the ankle down onto the foot. So the first impact is more that Achilles area.”

VAR: “So first impact is on the Achilles, on the shin.”

Assistant VAR: “With no chance of playing the ball.”

VAR: “So, it’s high up above the ankle then it comes back down. OK, just get me the number please.”

Assistant VAR: “It’s number 49, Lewis-Skelly.”

VAR: “Michael, confirming the on-field decision of red card for serious foul play for Myles Lewis-Skelly. Away, 49. Check complete.”

“From the outset, we would prefer a yellow card in this situation,” said Webb on the latest episode of Match Official’s Mic’d Up.

“Clearly the referee on the day felt the actions of Myles Lewis-Skelly, he saw the player moving in towards an opponent without any ability or intention of playing the ball – with the intention of stopping the opponent. And the referee sees a raised foot make high contact and the opponent went down.

“The referee felt it was serious foul play, the VAR checked the footage to see if the call was clearly and obviously wrong and he felt it wasn’t – seeing that the contact was quite high up on the leg.

“But we know that for serious foul play, we need excessive force or brutality and what we see here is that high contact [just] glancing and coming off the leg quite quickly.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The Ref Watch panel take a closer look at Arsenal’s Myles Lewis-Skelly’s red card against Wolves and discuss whether VAR should have intervened with the decision to send the 18-year-old off.

“So for that reason, everybody pretty much in the game has formed the same conclusion that this is falling short of serious foul play – because of that glancing contact. Because the studs don’t really go right into the leg, they glance in before coming down onto the foot.”

Webb: I understand Oliver’s thinking – it’s not a horrendous call

The decision to send Lewis-Skelly off caused great debate in the game. Among widespread criticism, Sky Sports’ Micah Richards said it was “the worst decision I’ve ever seen in Premier League football history”.

Webb believes there were some criteria in the Lewis-Skelly challenge to send him off, but the overall evidence pointed towards a yellow card.

“There are some considerations that might support a red card, but there are a whole host of others that say it is not quite there, so on balance we would rather this had been a yellow card,” said Webb.

“The VAR didn’t want to re-referee the situation, they were mindful of the referee’s call standing unless it is clearly and obviously wrong. They felt it wasn’t at that level on the day and decided to leave it as a red card on the field.

“I’ve heard this described as a really horrendous officiating decision. It’s not! I understand why the referee saw this on the day as a serious foul-play action.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments