Want to stay up to date with the latest news?

We would love to hear from you! Please fill in your details and we will stay in touch. It's that simple!

Customise Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

back to top
Friday, March 28, 2025
HomeHistoryIs Facebook Censorship Punishing the Wrong People and Overlooking the Real Threats?

Is Facebook Censorship Punishing the Wrong People and Overlooking the Real Threats?

Facebook has once again blocked Ancient Origins for posting content deemed inappropriate. This seems to happen almost every month, with the site being suspended for a significant period each time. We are uncertain if this image will pass Facebook’s automated censorship system, but at this point, we have little to lose.

Here are the latest problematic images. Last month, Ancient Origins was suspended for sharing images from an Egyptian papyrus depicting the process of circumcision in Egypt. Warning: the following images contain nudity.

Papyrus showing ancient Egyptian men undergoing circumcision. (archivohistoria/CC BY 4.0)

Even after appeal, this image was deemed in violation of Facebook’s rules regarding nudity or sexual content.

Is Facebook correct in their judgment, or should Ancient Origins reconsider their moderation standards?

This week, the issue has revolved around an article showcasing a bog body, resulting in a violent content violation. Viewer discretion is advised.

A bog body, severed at the waist, known as Clonycavan Man. (CC BY-SA 2.0)

While these images may not be suitable for all viewers, it begs the question of whether they pose a societal threat. Ancient Origins has faced previous blocks for sharing images of Egyptian mummies and nude statues.

Is Facebook’s cautious approach justified? Share your thoughts in the comments section.

Why the Issue Persists

It is crucial to acknowledge the challenging task Facebook moderators face in reviewing a vast number of images, many of which can be disturbing, to prevent unsuspecting users from encountering them. However, there seems to be a gap in the pre-filtering stage where AI may be falling short.

Social media platforms were once celebrated as digital town squares for free expression, news dissemination, and idea-sharing. In recent times, these platforms have assumed a moderation role, regulating and censoring content. Despite the intention to curb harmful speech and misinformation, the execution often falls short.

Increasingly, innocent posts with opinions, historical narratives, or essential storytelling images are being penalized, impacting small publishers. This occurs while harmful content somehow slips through the cracks.

The Quest for Civil Discourse

Striking a balance akin to civilized society poses a challenge. The town square should offer a space for free speech and expression, respecting others’ right to a comfortable public environment free from offensive behaviors.

In a structured society, norms and checks safeguard individuals to some extent. ‘Freedom of speech’ does have limits, such as prohibitions against inciting violence or hatred. Similarly, in social media spaces, new acceptability rules have emerged, sometimes disregarding established societal norms.

Whereas an individual shouting obscenities in public would drive away bystanders, alternatives exist in traditional public spaces. Similarly, social media platforms are diversifying, offering uncensored outlets for free speech alongside curated safe spaces like Facebook.

The onus is on leading platforms like Facebook to adapt, fostering open and civilized spaces mirroring real-world norms. Failure to do so might pave the way for competitors to dominate the market with better solutions.

New platforms like Bluesky are emerging, aiming to uphold ‘freedom of speech without freedom of reach,’ allowing individuals to control their engagements. The evolution of social media spaces will ultimately lead to a more civil environment. Facebook needs to refine its approach swiftly before competitors seize the opportunity.

Top image: Right screenshot of Facebook’s censorship notice. Right; Egyptian circumcision papyrus. Source: archivohistoria/CC BY 4.0

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments